During the scheduled session for 28 April, the class has to discuss the contextualisation of their projects, both specifically in relation to relevant photographic issues and debates (both contemporary and historical) and in relation to fields outside of photography.
To prepare for this session, I have to complete the following tasks:
For the purposes of discussion, bring three references that I feel are integral to my own project:
- One contemporary reference (within the field of photography/art).
- One historical reference (within the field of photography/art).
- One outside of the realm of art and photography.
I had to be prepared to:
- Present these references to the group
- Explain how these references have:
- Informed my project so far
- Have helped to propel it forwards.
During this discussion, each class member (including myself), had to give special emphasis to:
In relation to one of the above ‘integral references’, I am asked to either:
- Conduct a short interview/conversation with someone who is in some way connected to one of my references.
OR
- Write a short (400-500 word) reflective review of an exhibition, gallery-talk, interview, film, novel, article, online conversation/talk/event, etc. related to one of my references for the purposes of discussion amongst the group.
These are the relevant posts with the results of my work for these tasks. I have fully written reflective reviews of both the historical reference and the one outside the realm of art and photography. The contemporary reference has not been fully written but can be utilised for the purpose of this seminar.
Contemporary reference (within the field of photography/art):
Historical reference (within the field of photography/art):
Reference outside of the realm of art and photography:
AGM60 Non-Photography/Art Reference for Seminar 28 April 2020





























































































